General issues
-
The continuing of the war in Iraq, which came to a close in mid-April,
impacted travel patterns across the world. Demand for hotel accommodation
in the Middle East and key European gateway cities were consequently affected.
-
SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) continued to impact demand in
key locations across Asia Pacific, in particular Beijing, Hong Kong and
Singapore.
April 2003
performance
April
performance in US dollars |
Occupancy
|
Average
room rate
|
RevPAR
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
%
|
|
US$
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
Pacific (HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately
1,000 hotels across the region) |
|
|
Auckland |
63.4
|
-6.1%
|
70
|
28.0%
|
44
|
20.2%
|
Beijing |
28.4
|
-65.5%
|
79
|
-3.5%
|
23
|
-66.8%
|
Hong Kong |
13.2
|
-83.9%
|
87
|
-37.3%
|
11
|
-89.9%
|
Singapore |
25.2
|
-65.0%
|
72
|
-14.7%
|
18
|
-70.1%
|
Sydney |
64.6
|
-9.3%
|
96
|
12.9%
|
62
|
2.4%
|
Tokyo |
67.2
|
-18.2%
|
174
|
5.5%
|
117
|
-13.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caribbean
& Latin America (HotelBenchmark sample represents
approximately 120 hotels across the region) |
|
Buenos Aires |
48.7
|
23.9%
|
84
|
-19.2%
|
41
|
0.1%
|
Mexico City |
60.0
|
-15.1%
|
133
|
0.5%
|
80
|
-14.6%
|
Quito |
53.2
|
-6.5%
|
73
|
0.9%
|
39
|
-5.7%
|
Sao Paulo |
50.3
|
5.0%
|
84
|
-21.5%
|
42
|
-17.6%
|
Santiago |
58.0
|
8.6%
|
95
|
-20.8%
|
55
|
-14.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
(HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately 3,500
hotels across the region) |
|
|
Amsterdam |
74.0
|
-13.9%
|
145
|
0.9%
|
107
|
-13.1%
|
Berlin |
59.1
|
-8.9%
|
92
|
8.8%
|
54
|
-0.9%
|
Brussels |
59.4
|
-13.1%
|
103
|
-2.0%
|
61
|
-14.9%
|
London |
59.9
|
-15.9%
|
143
|
-2.8%
|
86
|
-18.2%
|
Madrid |
65.6
|
-16.1%
|
150
|
7.6%
|
99
|
-9.7%
|
Paris |
56.6
|
-21.6%
|
179
|
10.1%
|
101
|
-13.7%
|
Rome |
64.5
|
-11.7%
|
172
|
6.9%
|
111
|
-5.7%
|
Vienna |
64.9
|
-1.2%
|
95
|
20.7%
|
62
|
19.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle
East (HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately
500 hotels across the region) |
|
|
Cairo |
40.5
|
-31.8%
|
58
|
-3.1%
|
24
|
-33.9%
|
Dubai |
57.4
|
-28.6%
|
108
|
-8.5%
|
62
|
-34.7%
|
Jerusalem |
23.8
|
1.7%
|
96
|
9.0%
|
23
|
10.9%
|
Riyadh |
58.4
|
-18.2%
|
111
|
-7.7%
|
65
|
-24.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
performance in Euros |
Occupancy
|
Average
room rate
|
RevPAR
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
%
|
|
Euros
|
|
Euros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
(HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately 3,500
hotels across the region) |
|
|
Amsterdam |
74.0
|
-13.9%
|
130
|
-18.5%
|
96
|
-29.8%
|
Berlin |
59.1
|
-8.9%
|
82
|
-12.2%
|
49
|
-20.0%
|
Brussels |
59.4
|
-13.1%
|
93
|
-20.9%
|
55
|
-31.3%
|
London |
59.9
|
-15.9%
|
128
|
-21.5%
|
77
|
-34.0%
|
Madrid |
65.6
|
-16.1%
|
135
|
-13.1%
|
88
|
-27.1%
|
Paris |
56.6
|
-21.6%
|
160
|
-11.1%
|
91
|
-30.3%
|
Rome |
64.5
|
-11.7%
|
154
|
-13.7%
|
99
|
-23.8%
|
Vienna |
64.9
|
-1.2%
|
85
|
-2.5%
|
55
|
-3.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling 12 months
to end of April 2003
Rolling
12 months to end of April 2003 in US dollars |
Occupancy
|
Average
room rate
|
RevPAR
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
%
|
|
US$
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
Pacific (HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately
1,000 hotels across the region) |
|
|
Auckland |
71.5
|
7.5%
|
69
|
34.0%
|
49
|
44.0%
|
Beijing |
70.3
|
-3.1%
|
80
|
5.0%
|
56
|
1.7%
|
Hong Kong |
73.0
|
-4.1%
|
118
|
0.1%
|
86
|
-4.0%
|
Singapore |
65.6
|
-6.0%
|
84
|
-5.2%
|
55
|
-10.9%
|
Sydney |
72.5
|
6.6%
|
89
|
9.4%
|
64
|
16.6%
|
Tokyo |
78.9
|
-0.3%
|
178
|
5.2%
|
140
|
4.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caribbean
& Latin America (HotelBenchmark sample represents
approximately 120 hotels across the region) |
|
Buenos Aires |
46.6
|
-1.7%
|
86
|
-36.6%
|
40
|
-37.7%
|
Mexico City |
65.5
|
0.7%
|
131
|
-2.0%
|
86
|
-1.3%
|
Quito |
56.6
|
1.8%
|
75
|
5.2%
|
42
|
7.0%
|
Sao Paulo |
46.2
|
-6.2%
|
80
|
-29.5%
|
37
|
-33.9%
|
Santiago |
52.0
|
8.8%
|
93
|
-15.0%
|
48
|
-7.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
(HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately 3,500
hotels across the region) |
|
|
Amsterdam |
76.2
|
-4.4%
|
139
|
10.3%
|
106
|
5.4%
|
Berlin |
60.3
|
-7.4%
|
96
|
11.4%
|
58
|
3.2%
|
Brussels |
62.7
|
-5.1%
|
101
|
10.4%
|
63
|
4.8%
|
London |
73.5
|
1.1%
|
155
|
4.4%
|
114
|
5.5%
|
Madrid |
67.3
|
-0.4%
|
144
|
14.8%
|
97
|
14.3%
|
Paris |
69.9
|
-2.3%
|
186
|
15.6%
|
130
|
12.9%
|
Rome |
66.3
|
-3.7%
|
167
|
14.2%
|
111
|
10.0%
|
Vienna |
68.2
|
2.2%
|
88
|
12.5%
|
60
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle
East (HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately
500 hotels across the region) |
|
|
Cairo |
62.0
|
6.6%
|
64
|
-12.1%
|
40
|
-6.3%
|
Dubai |
74.7
|
4.8%
|
110
|
6.9%
|
82
|
12.0%
|
Jerusalem |
27.7
|
-7.7%
|
69
|
-1.9%
|
19
|
-9.5%
|
Riyadh |
59.1
|
2.1%
|
112
|
-3.5%
|
66
|
-1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling
12 months to end of April 2003 in Euros |
Occupancy
|
Average
room rate
|
RevPAR
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
2003
|
Change
|
%
|
|
Euros
|
|
Euros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
(HotelBenchmark sample represents approximately 3,500
hotels across the region) |
|
|
Amsterdam |
76.2
|
-4.4%
|
137
|
-4.1%
|
104
|
-8.3%
|
Berlin |
60.3
|
-7.4%
|
95
|
-3.1%
|
57
|
-10.3%
|
Brussels |
62.7
|
-5.1%
|
99
|
-4.7%
|
62
|
-9.5%
|
London |
73.5
|
1.1%
|
153
|
-9.4%
|
113
|
-8.3%
|
Madrid |
67.3
|
-0.4%
|
141
|
-0.8%
|
95
|
-1.2%
|
Paris |
69.9
|
-2.3%
|
184
|
0.4%
|
129
|
-1.9%
|
Rome |
66.3
|
-3.7%
|
165
|
-0.8%
|
109
|
-4.5%
|
Vienna |
68.2
|
2.2%
|
87
|
-2.3%
|
60
|
-0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES
Contributing hotels include both independent and group operated units
and the sample is typically representative of quality hotel supply. To
ensure direct comparability of results, only hotels that have been able
to provide two full years of trading data have been included in this survey.
The exception however, is that new hotel openings are now included in the
results.
This report contains proprietary information of Deloitte & Touche,
and any reproduction of this report, in whole or part, must be attributed
to the 'HotelBenchmark Survey by Deloitte & Touche' and display the
following copyright notice �©Deloitte & Touche 2003. All rights
reserved.� Failure to do so may result in legal action.
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information
contained in this report, this cannot be guaranteed and neither Deloitte
& Touche nor any related entity shall have any liability to any person
or entity who relies on the information contained in this report. Any such
reliance is solely at the users risk.
|