Hotel Online  Special Report
---
Recent California Supreme 
Court Ruling:

Wages Due for 
"Non-Working" Employees 
August 2000 - In Morillion v. Royal Packing Co. the California Supreme Court recently held unanimously that when an employer requires employees to report to a designated meeting place and travel on company buses, the employer was required to compensate the workers for that travel time, despite the fact that workers were allowed to sleep or read while on the bus.

The Trial Court Found for the Employer.

In a class action suit led by farm worker Jose Morillion, workers for Royal Packing argued that they were entitled to overtime wages and penalties because they weren't paid for time spent assembling at a designated meeting place, traveling on Royal's bus, waiting for the bus at day's end, and riding the bus back to a departure spot. Plaintiffs argued that this time was compensable because the employer required that it be done. The trial court rejected this argument, and the plaintiffs appealed the decision to California's highest court. 

The Supreme Court Holds for the Workers. 

The Supreme Court agreed with the employees, describing the assembling, traveling, and waiting time as "compulsory travel time." It explained that this was payable time because the workers were "subject to the employer's control." They did not also have to be "suffered or permitted to work" during this period (a phrase normally used to refer to the time spent actually doing work. Other examples may include work performed even when the employer doesn't ask for it, as happens with unauthorized overtime - coming in early and staying late - or time spent working at home. In this case, the Court did not even consider whether employees were suffered or permitted to work. It looked at something "less than work" - travel and waiting time - and made the employer pay for it simply because the employer required it.

Implications for the Hospitality Industry. 

Implications of this decision on California employers may be substantial, and may expose hotel and resort employers to significant penalties for wage and overtime violations. Employers must pay for time spent traveling from one "meeting place" to another work location (even if the "free ride" is paid for by the employer), as long as the employer requires employer-sponsored travel. The scenario is easy to imagine where a hotel requires its housekeeping staff to assemble at one hotel to work, then meet in the parking lot at a specific time to catch a ride to the next location, work there, and then meet again to ride to another hotel or to a departure spot, the employer will likely have to compensate the housekeeping staff for the time it has spent assembling, waiting, and traveling. The fact that the staff does not perform work during these times doesn't matter if the hotel requires the staff to assemble, wait, and travel. Under Morillion, employers that have failed to pay compensation for this time are liable for wage and overtime penalties.

How to Avoid Morillion-Related Wage and Overtime Penalties. 

To avoid substantial penalties, California employers need to review their compensation policies and ask:

  • Do our policies require employees to gather at a specific meeting place before or after they perform work?
  • Do we require our employees to travel to work sites on company-arranged transportation?
  • Do we require employees to travel between locations in the same day, and meet at specific times and places in those locations?
If the answer to any of these questions is yes, employers should contact their labor and employment counsel immediately for legal advice regarding wage and overtime violations.

Contact:  R. Scott Brink at (310) 785-5365 or [email protected].

###
For more information:
Visit Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP�s 
web site: http://www.jmbm.com
Email Jim Butler at [email protected]
Or contact 
Jim Butler at the Firm
 Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP
  2121 Avenue of the Stars
 Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Phone: 310-201-3526 
 --


Also See: Annual Review of the Mexican Lodging Market / JMBM / March 2000 
You Don't Have to Give It All Up! (With a Union Neutrality Agreement) / JMBM / April 1999 
Layoffs Bring Double Payment for Age Discrimination Claims / JMBM / Feb 1998 
Special Reports / Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP

To search Hotel Online data base of News and Trends Go to Hotel.Online Search
Back to Hotel.Online Press Releases
Home | Welcome! | Hospitality News | Classifieds | Catalogs & Pricing | Viewpoint Forum | Ideas/Trends
Please contact Hotel.Online with your comments and suggestions.