Eternal Bliss or End in Divorce?
By Jim Butler, Hotel Lawyer | Author of www.HotelLawBlog.com
One of my steady themes here at www.HotelLawBlog.com, is that lifestyle hotels are the hottest thing going in new hotel development, particularly hotel mixed-use. (See, for example, "The new "LIFESTYLE" hotel brands are changing the hotel industry and hotel mixed-use.") But at a press conference held on the roof of Schrager's Gramercy Park Hotel in Manhattan at 10:00 am on June 14, 2007, Bill Marriott (chairman and CEO of Marriott International) and Ian Schrager (the founder of Ian Schrager Hotels, now known as "Morgans Hotels") surprised most of the hotel industry with their news. Marriott (age 75) and Schrager (now 60) announced formal plans to partner in the creation of a new lifestyle boutique hotel brand. The as-yet-unnamed-brand will provide the high-design, boutique, lifestyle product that Schrager invented, with Marriott's world-class hotel operating resources and development support.
For several years, industry experts have wondered how Marriott International could surrender leadership in the lifestyle boutique area to Starwood's W brand, which some call a knockoff of Schrager's original concept. Only half in jest, some predicted that Marriott would spawn a similarly hip "M" brand (which looks a lot like a "W" turned over). If Marriott is to reclaim its share of this exploding lifestyle segment, it clearly needed to move quickly to make up for lost time. But many think the marriage of Ian Schrager and Bill Marriott is doomed to an early divorce, if it even makes it to the conjugal bed. Doubtful pundits cite fundamental incompatibilities of style and approach. Meanwhile, Schrager and Marriott are projecting that at least five firm development deals will be signed for the new brand before 2008, and are looking for more than 100 hotels to be open within a decade.
What does the future hold for the "M" brand (or whatever it is ultimately called)?
That's the question on everyone's lips.
Marriott International is a powerhouse in the hotel world. It has several thousand hotels under its mighty brands, and is supported by MARSHA, one of the strongest hotel reservations systems in the world. Not that long ago, many thought Marriott had the "best in class" product in almost every hotel segment. But then Marriott began relinquishing its dominance to Four Seasons and Mandarin in the luxury segment, to Hilton Garden Inn and Embassy Suites in the select service and extended stay arenas, and completely abdicated the boutique lifestyle space.
Less than 5 months ago, at the ALIS Conference in Los Angeles, Bill Marriott was interviewed in a general session "hot seat." Asked about lifestyle boutique hotels, Marriott said, "Lifestyle hotels are a generational thing. I am not in that generation. We are studying it and trying to understand it. It is important and going to get more important." (See "Notable quotables from hotel industry thought leaders 2007")
At the press conference announcing the deal with Schrager, Bill Marriott had apparently found the solution to his problem. Marriott described Schrager's role in the new partnership by saying, "Ian is going to be developing a new experience for people looking for a hotel with more than just a bed and breakfast It is a real different lifestyle experience that he will be creating to attract a group of guests and customers who are not staying in Marriott hotels today."
Ian Schrager, fresh from Studio 54 (and a felony conviction for tax fraud that no one seems to mind these days), practically invented the hip design, boutique hotel concept that became his trademark. The hotels he helped create now operate under the Morgans Hotel Group banner without Schrager's active involvement. W took his concept to the fullest market exploitation of any hotel company, and to the bank as well. Schrager has a reputation for his creativity, volatile temper, and attention to the finest details of implementing his concepts.
Logically, one can see why Marriott needs Schrager to recapture a share in the hottest segment in the hotel industry. They need a creative genius and innovator who won't be bound by the traditional models of solid work-a-day Marriott brands. And Schrager has never been able to play in the big leagues with the likes of Sternlicht and Marriott. He needs the hotel operational support and development resources of a company like Marriott International.
At the press conference, Schrager thought the
similarities in his and Marriott's character were more compelling than
the obvious differences. Schrager cited Marriott's commitment to excellence,
desire to be the best, and have an impact, incredible curiosity, competitive
nature, and drive to set the new standard. Schrager said he had identical
characteristics that would make the marriage work.
So how could this great combination fail?
The reasons for success are manifest. Schrager and Marriott bring talents and resources that could provide the recipe for great success. So how could this marriage fail?
Some experts look at Ian Schrager and Bill Marriott
and are skeptical that the new partnership can work. In fact, they predict
an early failure. They say that the personalities and cultures of the two
leaders are inherently incompatible -- like oil and water. They compare
the imaginative, creative, free-wheeling, open shirt culture of Ian Schrager
with the highly organized, manual-driven, institutional, no-nonsense, coat-and-tie
culture of Bill Marriott and shrug. Worse, both men are used to demanding
and getting their way. Ian Schrager does not take orders from anybody,
and Bill Marriott likes to give approval over some of the smallest design
features of hotels sporting his brands. What will Schrager do when Marriott
criticizes the color of the silk hanging from the ceiling, or some innovative
design feature in the restrooms?
We wish them luck and look forward to seeing great things from this new partnership. We hope it is not the story of the scorpion riding the back of the frog across the lake because he could not swim. . .
P.S. In case you have not heard the story of the scorpion and the frog, here is an abbreviated version:
One day, a scorpion desperately needed to cross a lake, but scorpions cannot swim. Seeing a frog at the water's edge, the scorpion begged for a ride on the frog's back. At first, the frog refused, protesting that the scorpion would sting him on the way, the frog would become paralyzed and they both would drown.Please send me your thoughts at email@example.com.
About the Author:
|Also See:||Marriott International Partnering with Ian Schrager to Create a New Hotel Brand with as Many as 100 Distinct Properties; Plan to Radically Rethink the Boutique Hotel Concept / June 2007|
|Blackstone's LXR Luxury Hotels Subsidiary Planning a $20 million Conversion of a 38 Year Old Fort Lauderdale Holiday Inn into its New Lodging Concept - Stay Social / September 2006|
To search Hotel Online data base of News and Trends Go to Hotel.OnlineSearch
Home | Welcome| Hospitality News | Classifieds| One-on-One |
Viewpoint Forum | Industry Resources
Please contact Hotel.Onlinewith your comments and suggestions.