Hotel Online Special Report

advertisement
.
Review of 9/11 Predictions and the Hotel Sector
Outlook into 2003
by Melinda McKay, Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels 
October 2002

It has been nearly one year since the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. Following the tragedy, the country began to regroup and formulate predictions on the overall economic and various industry sector performances in the year that would follow. In this report, Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels examines which post 9/11 predictions came to fruition and which did not, and in doing so discusses the status and outlook of the economy, hotel sector and capital markets.

U, V or W � The Economic Alphabet Game

Will it be a "U" or "V" shaped economic recovery? That was the debate among economists around the world following 9/11. The "V" shaped recovery depicted a contraction in the US economy during Q3-01 and Q4-01, risk to the first two quarters of 2002, but strong growth expected by mid 2002. This was considered likely 12 months ago given: (a) a robust consumer market (via the housing sector); and (b) business balance sheet strength (mainly via low cost of debt). The reality: a blend of a "U" and "W" shaped recovery, which is spelled out in the following table 
 

POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
Following the 9/11 attacks a "V" style economic recovery is more likely than a "U" shaped recovery. FALSE: While Q1 2002 eluded to a "V" shaped recovery, the remainder of 2002 to-date has been marked by corporate accounting scandals and stock market volatility. In addition, the decline in GDP began earlier than originally forecast. As a result, GDP growth of 2.3% for full-year 2002 is expected, followed by 3.1% increase in 2003. Therefore, the reality is more likely a cross-between a "U" and "W" shaped recovery.

What does the next 12 months hold?

The expectation is for a recovery to normalized growth rates by 2003. Weak profits and layoffs continue to characterize the corporate sector, although an improvement in earnings is expected in the second half of 2002. On reflection, the remainder of 2002 will record modest GDP growth of between 2.3 to 2.8 percent, with 2003 expected to measure 3.1 percent. These trends are reflected in the following graph. However, a crisis of confidence in the stock market could affect the timing and pace of recovery, with consumers and businesses likely to limit spending until equity prices lift decisively and the bond yield spread narrows. Borrowing costs remain at a 40-year low and capital investment is predicted to re-commence in the first part of 2003. Gross debt flows to real estate remain very strong; however, the net level is lower due to high level of refinancing.

There is a real possibility of a war with Iraq, however the impact on the US economy is anticipated to be limited for a number of reasons. Firstly, the potential invasion has been highly publicized, with consumers and the stock market already pricing-in the effect of such a conflict. This contrasts to the 1990 Gulf War, which was unexpected shock and therefore had a significant impact on consumer confidence and the economy. Secondly, the actual cost of the war is unlikely to impact greatly on the economy or long term interest rates, with the estimated $8.0 billion price tag (if similar in scope to Desert Storm) increasing the budget deficit from 1.3 percent of GDP to 2.0 percent of GDP. While the most obvious impact would be on oil prices, it is doubtful a spike will occur as other oil producing nations have had time to increase oil productions and inventories have subsequently risen. Add to this the fact that a �war premium� has recently been built in to oil prices to take into consideration the likelihood of conflict. The mid case scenario forecast by Economy.com estimates a 45 basis point detrimental effect on GDP in 2003 translating into a revised growth of 2.7 percent.

However, key risks remain including further terrorism attacks, unusually large losses of American lives, extended conflict and a complete destabilization of the Middle East region, all of which would negatively affect consumer confidence and national economic health. Yet many experts predict the relative likelihood of these events occurring as diminutive.

US Avoids Double Dip Recession

Source: Economy.com (as of September 2002)



Hotel Performance � a Comparison of Realized Risk by Segment

The U.S. hotel sector is dragging itself out of one of the sharpest downturns in history. Occupancy (OCC) and average daily rate (ADR) remain slightly below 2001 levels for ytd August 2002, resulting in a 6.2 percent decline in revenue per available room (RevPAR) during the period. The graph on the page overleaf depicts the pattern of OCC, ADR and RevPAR. This is not dissimilar to the outlook 12 months ago, although few predicted the depth and length of the decline, with performance levels anticipated to recover by mid 2002. However, the consensus that the industry was in a much stronger position to weather this downturn has been proven correct, as outlined in the table on the following page. 

US Hotel Performance, 2001 to 2002 ytd July

Source: STR; Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels


 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOMEPOST
The hotels sector is in a much stronger position to absorb the downturn than during the last recession.  TRUE: At the operating performance level, hotel profitability has been protected to a large extent by solid reserves and a continual improvement in operating ratios. On the capital markets level, we have not experienced the number of "fire sales" as during the last recession. Conservative lending and a more educated investment market have meant the mortgage default rate has remained at an historically low rate of less than one percent (according to the American Council of Life Insurers).

In our September 2001 FocusOn edition, we predicted a number of segments would be more at risk than others, while certain others would experience the least negative impact. Of the 10 predictions made 12 months ago, eight have come true. These are detailed in the following two tables.
 

POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
Markets/segments most at risk: 

A. Large U.S. cities with high proportion of long haul and business travelers.
 
 
 

B. Long-haul fly-over locations. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C.  Airport hotels.
 
 
 
 
 

D.  Convention cities.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

E.  New York and Washington D.C.

A.  TRUE: These segments have not recovered at the same pace as domestic leisure demand and therefore hotels in these cities have continued to compete more aggressively on rate to secure business. The result is continued deep erosion of RevPAR, with cities such as San Francisco, Boston, New York and Chicago recording falls between 10% to 27% in RevPAR during ytd July 2002.

B.  TRUE: During the last quarter of 2001, Honolulu registered a 24% decline in RevPAR, a reflection of its exposure to the international market. This decline has softened to a decline of 13% during ytd July 2002, making it the fifth worst performer of the top 25 U.S. markets. The Caribbean experienced a fall of 18.8% over the last four months of 2001. However, winter increases in tourist arrivals were reported for all the major destinations in the region.

C.  TRUE: Statistics prove that this segment has continued to be the poorest performer, with RevPAR falling by 20% in the last four months of 2001. YTD July 2002 results, while improved, still remain 10% below 2001 levels.

D.  TRUE: The immediate fallout on convention demand was significant during the latter part of 2002. The effect is still washing through the market. Convention and meetings, while not cancelled, are drawing notably smaller crowds. Cities that have particularly felt this impact include Chicago, Los Angeles and New York, all experiencing RevPAR declines in excess of 10% during ytd July 2002.

E.  TRUE: These markets were definitely hit hardest, recording drops in RevPAR of between 27 and 37 percent during the last half of 2001. Performance still remains negative although the depth of the decline has been consistently softening.


 
 
POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
Markets/segments least at risk: 

A.  Drive-to hotel locations.
 
 
 

B.  Hotels located on feeder roads.
 
 

C.  Domestic leisure destinations, due to fear of overseas travel and lack of exposure to inbound tourism.

D.  Hotels proximate to technology, communication suppliers and defense.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

E.  Suburban locations given the potential longer-term shift in corporate offices to those suburb locations in close proximity to major central business districts.

A.  TRUE: Regional hotel markets have fared better in the 12 months since 9/11. For example, Houston and Norfolk-Virginia Beach posted RevPAR gains in 2001, with Norfolk building on this gain by increasing RevPAR by 12.4% in ytd July 2002. Philadelphia was the only other market (in the 25 U.S. largest) to post a RevPAR gain during ytd July 2002.

B.  TRUE: The highway hotel segment reported the softest decline in 2001 and ytd July 2002 RevPAR of 2.3% and 3.2%, respectively.

C.  TRUE: Domestic leisure destinations have indeed fared better than those cities exposed to international visitors and corporate demand, which both experienced sharper declines and are taking longer to recover.

D.  FALSE: Hotels proximate to communication suppliers and defense � there is little evidence to suggest markets catering to this demand (such as Washington, D.C., San Diego, Austin, Seattle and Boston) have enjoyed a market premium, although Washington, D.C. has posted respectable performance in comparison to the top 25 US markets. San Francisco, the biggest city catering to the technology market, was never predicted to be sheltered from continuing declines.

E.  FALSE: The flight to suburbs has not occurred, but rather city centers remain popular. In a recent survey of commercial real estate occupiers by Jones Lang LaSalle, the majority of respondents (54%) reported no changes in plans regarding their dispersal of operations by geography or property type, nor did they expect to consolidate locations, reduce locations within CBDs, high rises or trophy locations, or expand operations in suburban locations. 

In a recent survey of key real estate executives from 50 of its largest (mainly Fortune 1000) clients, Jones Lang LaSalle looked to ascertain the impact of 9/11 on corporate real estate strategies. In many cases, these effects translate to the hotel sector, namely:

  • The vast majority of companies surveyed have undertaken at least one new safety, security or preparedness measure in response to the events of 9/11. This has been the case in many of the hotel operations we have reviewed in both investment sales and advisory assignments since 9/11. 
  • Among various building management issues, real estate executives ranked entrance security as the most important concern by far. 
  • Even though many changes already have been implemented, companies foresee more to come.
  • An overwhelming majority of companies believe that safety and security measures and disaster recovery planning are receiving more scrutiny from both internal and external audiences. This is acutely relevant in the hotel sector given that it caters to an open public. 
  • Somewhat surprisingly, perhaps, most companies have not yet seen significantly increased occupancy costs since 9/11. However, the effect of increased insurance premiums and security enhancements, particularly in major city centers, will be felt in the hotel sector, as contracts are renewed. 
  • According to the companies surveyed, there has been no wholesale abandonment of CBDs and trophy high rises. This will continue to support corporate-led hotel demand in CBDs and negates the theory that suburban hotels will experience an upturn in corporate travelers. 
What does the next 12 months hold?

Year-on-year statistics during the last four months of 2002 will start to show a considerable improvement given that historical comparisons will include the impact of 9/11 and the full brunt of the economic recession. 

Luxury hotels, while remaining at the bottom of the performance ladder, have shown the largest improvement in performance ratios in 2002 and this is likely to continue. Real momentum, however, will not gather until the middle part of 2003 as corporate travel budgets begin to resemble historical amounts. In terms of location, airport hotels are likely to remain out of favor, at least until there is a dramatic recovery in air travel. Resort properties have shown the largest improvement since 9/11, and this recovery will continue as exchange rate influences keep domestic travelers at home and attract international tourists (particularly as their local economies improve).

Leisure travel has rebounded faster than corporate visitation. However, with a continued built in GDP growth, eventual stabilization of financial markets and a return to corporate profits, major cities are likely to enjoy a commensurate lift in performance ratios. Yet these trends are unlikely to materialize until 2003, which places a real recovery for corporate-led markets later that year. 

Investors have become increasingly bullish on the outlook of major US cities. According to our Jul-02 edition of the Hotel Investment Sentiment Survey (HISS), San Francisco and Boston are among the top markets expected to enjoy the largest turnaround in trading performance between the short (six months) and medium (two years) term, with particularly strong medium term expectations for New York. In general, trading expectations for the remainder of 2002 are weighted toward the negative, but a significantly higher proportion of investors believe that the market will be flat or improve. 

Reflective of this outlook, investors consider that most of the hotel markets have reached the bottom of the cycle, and in fact some, namely New York, Los Angeles and Washington D.C., are positioned in the early upturn phase. Given investors' confidence in the medium term trading performance of the hotel markets, it would not be surprising to see all of the 15 North American markets on the upturn during the next HISS.

Transaction Activity Rebounds

Immediately following 9/11, the hotel capital markets froze, with virtually all in-progress hotel transactions being cancelled or significantly delayed. What followed was a skittish capital market, with cap rate expectations soaring in compensation for what investors perceived as a highly uncertain outlook for hotel performance. In turn, owners were reluctant to part with assets given the dramatic short term decline in asset values. The prediction that this "standoff" between buyers and sellers would come to an end was proved correct as outlined in the following table.
 

POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
The gap between bid and ask price in hotel transactions to narrow as owners realize that 2001 was a "bubble" and hotel values have since fallen. TRUE: Following a dearth of activity in the six months following September 2001, buyers and sellers finally came together, with transaction volume spiking at just under $1 billion in Q2-02. This represents a 243% increase over Q1-02 levels, although it remains 23% below Q2-01 numbers.

Further evidence that investors are being more realistic about asset values is the easing of cap rate expectations over the last six months, as confirmed by the Jul-02 of our HISS. Investors are less aggressive on cap rate requirements, with the required rate shifting down slightly, particularly in the Florida markets and in New York and Washington D.C. Other industry sources support these trends. As the graph overleaf illustrates, a spike in yield requirements has subsequently leveled or contracted in Q2-02. These movements are not so obvious as they represent national trends.

Hotel Investor Yield Requirements

Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels; Lodging Databank



What does the next 12 months hold?

Expectations for continued growth in transaction activity are well founded. The combination of increases in demand and limited new supply will help support growth in RevPAR during 2003. Combined with the existing pent-up investor demand, this creates an environment ripe for a record volume of transactions. Already, the number of investors hunting for assets exceeds product available for sale. This was reaffirmed in the Jul-02 edition of our HISS, in which over one-third of investors indicated they were seeking to buy hotels, while very few indicated a sell attitude 

Given these conditions, transaction volume is expected to reach approximately $3 billion by the close of 2002, with 2003 set to record around twice that amount of sales. These trends are detailed on a quarterly basis in the graph on the following page. Cap rates will conform to historical numbers during 2003 given the sentiment that the market has reached bottom and investors will be pricing upside moving forward. 
 
 

Hotel Transaction Trends by Quarter

Quarterly Hotel Transaction Trends
Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels; Lodging Databank


Debt Markets Remain Open for Hotel Lending

The debt markets have slowly recovered since 9/11 however, higher pricing and lower leverage ratios exist compared to pre-9/11. Gearing ratios have become increasingly conservative over the last six months, with higher pricing and lower loan-to-value (LTV) ratios than other forms of real estate. This trend was exhibited in the Jul-02 HISS results and underscores the prediction made 12 months ago as featured in the following table. 
 

POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
The debt markets are unlikely to shutdown lending to real estate, although capital flows will reduce. TRUE: Lending underwent a temporary freeze post 9/11, when the market adopted a "wait and see" approach. What followed was a flurry of loan restructuring, in an attempt to adjust to the altered operating ratios and take advantage of the 40-year low in interest rates. Hotel debt markets have remained open, but are characterized by higher pricing (225-300 bps over LIBOR) and lower LTV ratios (55-65%). 

Lenders will continue to approach hotel investments with caution until there is evidence of a real and sustained recovery in trading performance. Yet while lenders remain conservative there is in fact an excess of debt capital available given the comparatively limited number of deals in the market. On several recent debt placements, Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels has secured favorable financing terms due to lenders aggressively competing for deals.

The availability of and the environment surrounding terrorism insurance remains a notable issue when attempting to secure debt capital. Soon after the 9/11 attacks, the cost of coverage increased dramatically, while the available supply of terrorism insurance declined abruptly. According to a survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association of America, the lack of terrorism insurance has directly affected more than $8 billion in commercial property deals in the first half of 2002. However, in the hotel sector it appears that the issue of terrorism insurance has not stalled/cancelled any specific deal. This prediction is spelled out in the following table.
 

POST 9/11 PREDICTION
OUTCOME
Insurance premiums will escalate and render the debt markets more difficult to navigate. TRUE: Insurance costs have definitely escalated, with increases from 58% to 280% cited in Senate hearings during February 2002. The ability to secure terrorism insurance to a certain extent still remains a key hurdle. 

The situation remains unsettled, as the market for terrorism coverage is unstable. Prices remain high and securing coverage is becoming increasingly difficult in certain markets. Some insurers, for example, will not write policies for property located in zip codes in which the level of terrorism coverage they already support makes them averse to assuming additional risk. Some capital sources are unwilling to lend on real estate assets unless the full value of the loan is covered against terrorism claims. For those properties managed by a major flag, the hotel is often eligible to be covered by the management company�s blanket insurance policy. For individually managed/owned hotels, securing terrorism insurance has been more problematical and costly. Federal legislation designed to resolve the problem remains stalled in Congress, where provisions in an existing bill have rekindled a long-standing fight over tort reform. At best, hotel owners and investors are investing substantially more time and money to secure adequate levels of coverage in this challenging climate.

Conclusion

One year later, it is clear that the combined impact of 9/11 and the economic downturn on the U.S. hospitality industry has taken shape and will continue to evolve for some time. The most striking example of this is the extent to which terrorism insurance will continue to affect acquisition financing underwriting of prime city hotels. While the hotel sector continues to struggle with low performance ratios, fundamentals remain strong and all indicators point to a real recovery in 2003. Industry stakeholders should take some comfort in the fact that the market has in general performed to expectations, with 12 of the 15 predictions made one year ago being validated. This reflects an industry that has matured greatly over the last decade, particularly in the capital markets arena. 

Contact:


Anwar R. Elgonemy
Associate
Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels
2655 Le Jeune Road, Suite 1004
Coral Gables, Florida  33134
Tel:  (305) 779-4958
Fax: (305) 779-3063
[email protected]
www.joneslanglasallehotels.com

 
Also See The San Francisco Hotel Investment Climate in the Post-Tech Boom Paradigm / Anwar Elgonemy / Oct 2002
Debt Financing Alternatives & Debt Restructuring Strategies in the Lodging Industry / Anwar R. Elgonemy / Sept 2002
Concrete to Cash: Real Estate Sale-Leasebacks in the Lodging Sector / Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels / March 2002
The Dynamics of a Hotel Deal in Mexico / Jones Lang LaSalle / July 2002

To search Hotel Online data base of News and Trends Go to Hotel.Online Search



Home | Welcome! | Hospitality News | Classifieds | Catalogs & Pricing | Viewpoint Forum | Ideas/Trends
Please contact Hotel.Online with your comments and suggestions.