Close

Cart

Total $0.00

Checkout

Ithaca, NY, January 23, 2017 - Courts across the United States are in a potentially awkward position when they are presented with employers’ summary judgment motions relating to sexual harassment. As explained in a new Cornell report, judges often have to choose between following legal precedent or breaking the rule established by the Supreme Court. As explained in the report, “When Rules Are Made to Be Broken: The Case of Sexual Harassment Law,” by David Sherwyn, Nicholas F. Menillo, and Zev J. Eigen, the courts often choose to break the rules. Sherwyn is a professor of law at the Cornell School of Hotel Administration and director of the Cornell Institute for Hospitality Labor and Employment Law (CIHLER), which has issued the report. Menillo is an associate with Sullivan & Cromwell, and Eigen is the global director of data analytics at Littler Mendelson.

Their report presents a theoretical assessment and empirical analysis of judicial rule breaking with regard to two rules relating to sexual harassment. The first such rule, established in the Oncale decision, opened the door to the “equal-opportunity harasser,” who treats everyone badly and thus escapes the prohibition on harassment “due to sex.” The courts have generally followed this rule.

The other rule, set forth in the Ellerth and Faragher decisions, establishes a two-prong requirement for companies to demonstrate that they should not be held liable in the case of sexual harassment of an employee. The first prong is that the employer acted reasonably in relation to a complaint, and the second is that the employee acted unreasonably, usually indicated by a tardy complaint. Sherwyn and his co-authors concluded that judges are inclined to break the Ellerth/Faragher rule and find for the employer when they perceive that an employer that is otherwise meritorious could be held liable.

“We conclude that courts follow Oncale, even though it can yield an unjust outcome, because they see small repercussions,” said Sherwyn. “On the other hand, following the Ellerth and Faragher precedents would result in an unjust outcome with larger repercussions—which would be that an employer who has done the right thing still has to pay for the actions of a wayward employee.”

The authors point out that this analysis now points toward the outcome of yet another test, which was established in the Vance case. Here the Supreme Court removed most supervisors from the position of company agent (and therefore incurring liability for the employer if the supervisors are accused of sexual harassment) unless those supervisors also determine working conditions, such as pay and employment.

About the Cornell Institute for Hospitality Labor and Employment Relations

The purpose of the Cornell Institute for Hospitality Labor and Employment Relations was established in 2013 as a platform for students, employers, employees, unions, and their advocates involved in the hospitality industry. The institute’s mission is to support educational programs, sponsor and disseminate research, and hold conferences and roundtables dedicated to modernizing labor and employment relations, analyzing labor and employment law, and improving human resource management and leadership in the hospitality industry. To achieve this goal, the institute supports classes focusing on labor and employment relations; disseminates empirical, theoretical, and doctrinal scholarship; and sponsors conferences and roundtables.

Contact: Erica Heim

erh72@cornell.edu / 607.255.6574

Related News

The 2017 Cornell/ICHRIE Howard B. Meek Award Presented to Dr. Fred DeMicco

Top 5 Takeaways from Cornell's Master of Management in Hospitality Leadership Development Program

Cornell CHR Report Asks: "Do Property Characteristics or Cash Flow Drive Hotel Real Estate Value? The Answer Is Yes”

Cornell Research on Hotel Brand Standards: How to Pick the Right Amenities for Your Property

Cornell Study Examines Emerging Trends in Hotel Revenue Management

Cheryl Boyer to Serve as 2017 Cornell Hotel Society President

Cornell Study Highlights Diversification Benefits of REIT Stock Investments

Hotel Investment Climate Remains Favorable Despite Interest Rate Increases, Cornell Study Suggests

Roundtable Focuses on High-Tech Adoption in Hospitality Industry

Aimed to Help Hotels Reduce Restaurant Food Waste, Cornell Offers New Tool, FRESH: A Food-service Sustainability Rating

Hospitality Money Managers Should Avoid Short-term Trading According to New Cornell Study

Cornell Tool Allows Restaurants to Evaluate Early Bird & Night Owl Menu Specials Effectiveness

Cornell Study Puts Retaliation Claims in a Class by Themselves

Improved Hotel Sustainability Benchmarks Outlined by Cornell Study

Changing Relationship of Supervisors and Employees Revealed in Cornell Study

Changing Regulations Dominate Cornell Human Resources Roundtable

Cornell Study: Charging for Restaurant Reservations May Gain Acceptance

Cornell Hospitality Business Plan Competition Ends with First-ever Tie

91st Annual Hotel Ezra Cornell to Analyze Trends in Real Estate Ownership and Investment, Food and Beverage Industry

91st Annual Hotel Ezra Cornell to Examine the Dynamics of Workplace Diversity, Hotel Distribution, Social Media

All News »

Please login or register to post a comment.