Hotel Online
News for the Hospitality Executive


advertisement



 
 

  FelCor Reports 3rd Qtr 2010 Net Loss of $89.3 million which includes
a $65.8 million non-cash impairment charge
; RevPAR for the 82 Hotel Portfolio
Increased 6.3% for the Quarter
Hotel Operating Statistics

 


RevPAR Growth Accelerating

Portfolio Repositioning Continues


IRVING, Texas--November 3, 2010--FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (NYSE: FCH) today reported operating results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Summary:

  • Same-store revenue per available room ("RevPAR") at 82 consolidated hotels increased 6.3% for the quarter and 7.9% for September.
  • Adjusted EBITDA was $48.2 million and Adjusted FFO per share was $0.00 for the quarter, which was at the high-end of our expectations.
  • Hotel EBITDA margin increased 67 basis points for the quarter, driven by a 2.1% increase in average daily rate, or ADR.
  • Net loss was $89.3 million for the quarter.
  • Acquired the 383-room Fairmont Copley Plaza for $98.5 million, an iconic hotel located in the heart of Boston's Back Bay.
  • Began marketing the first group of hotels for disposition.

Third Quarter Operating Results:

Same-store RevPAR for 82 consolidated hotels was $87.83 for the quarter, a 6.3% increase compared to the same period in 2009 (excluding 14 hotels we are marketing for sale, RevPAR for our portfolio increased 6.7% during the quarter compared to the same period in 2009). RevPAR at these 82 hotels increased 7.9% during September from a 5.1% occupancy increase and a 2.7% ADR increase, compared to the same period in 2009. The RevPAR increase for the quarter was driven by a 4.2% occupancy increase to 72.7% and a 2.1% ADR increase to $120.85, compared to the same period in 2009. RevPAR increased at 61 of our hotels and in every major market, except for Orlando.

“The lodging industry fundamentals continue to strengthen, and we are pleased with our operating results for the quarter. While the booking window remains relatively short, group booking pace continues to improve each month, occupancy is improving and RevPAR growth is accelerating. We are taking advantage of the positive imbalance between demand and supply to remix our customer base and drive daily rates. During the quarter, ADR for our portfolio increased 2.1%, driven by a 14% increase of premium transient room nights," said Richard A. Smith, FelCor's President and Chief Executive Officer.

"We are focused on continuing to improve our overall portfolio quality, future growth rates and barriers-to-entry protection in order to increase shareholder value and return on invested capital. During the quarter, we acquired the Fairmont Copley Plaza. We have been very pleased with the performance of the hotel: RevPAR increased 14% for the hotel in September. In addition, we launched the second phase of asset sales bringing the first group of 14 hotels to market,” added Mr. Smith.

Third quarter Hotel EBITDA was $55.5 million, compared to $50.7 million for the same period in 2009, a 9.4% increase. Hotel EBITDA represents EBITDA generated by 82 same-store consolidated hotels prior to corporate expenses and joint venture adjustments. Hotel EBITDA margin was 23.5%, a 67 basis point increase compared to the same period in 2009. Hotel EBITDA margins were better than expectations and benefited from a 2.1% increase in ADR, but were impacted by hotel-level expenses that did not occur last year, such as salary and bonus increases. Excluding the 14 hotels that we are marketing for sale, Hotel EBITDA margin increased 102 basis points compared to 2009.

Adjusted EBITDA was $48.2 million, compared to $45.3 million for the same period in 2009, a 6.4% increase, and was at the high-end of our expectations.

Adjusted funds from operations (“FFO”) was a loss of $39,000 or $0.00 per share, compared to $9.0 million, or $0.14 per share, for the same period in 2009.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $98.5 million, or $1.04 per share, compared to $34.8 million, or $0.55 per share, for the same period in 2009. Net loss includes a $65.8 million non-cash impairment charge reflecting the reduced book values of eight of the 14 non-strategic hotels (three hotels comprise the majority of the impairment), as well as an $8.3 million gain on extinguishment of debt related to the disposition of one hotel. Prior year net loss included a $2.1 million impairment charge related to the sale of two hotels.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA margin, FFO, Adjusted FFO and Adjusted FFO per share are all non-GAAP financial measures. See our discussion of “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 14 for a reconciliation of each of these measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measure and for information regarding the use, limitations and importance of these non-GAAP financial measures.

Balance Sheet:

At September 30, 2010, we had $1.6 billion of consolidated debt outstanding, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.8%, and $192.5 million of cash and cash equivalents.

In July, we repaid two secured loans, totaling $5.6 million bearing an average interest rate of 8.3%, that were scheduled to mature next year.

On September 30, the Embassy Suites Hotel in Piscataway, New Jersey was transferred to the lender in full satisfaction of the $18 million loan secured by that hotel. We recorded an $8.2 million gain on the extinguishment of that debt (which reflects the principal amount of that loan in excess of the value of that hotel as reflected on our balance sheet). The hotel generated $750,000 of EBITDA during the trailing twelve months ended September 2010. We also continue to work with the special servicer to transfer the Embassy Suites Chicago - North Shore/Deerfield to the lender in full satisfaction of the $14 million loan secured by that hotel, which matured in May 2010.

“We successfully refinanced all of our near-term debt and eliminated all of our maturity issues. We also have reduced our leverage this year and now have 10 unencumbered hotels. As a result of the recent equity offering, debt repayments and improving EBITDA, we now expect to be cash flow positive for the year after capital expenditures. Furthermore, we expect cash flow growth to accelerate significantly with the recovery and expect to reduce our leverage significantly through improved operations and using proceeds from future asset sales to repay debt. We will continue to look for additional opportunities to reduce our average interest rate, increase our flexibility and ensure adequate long-term liquidity on an economically sound basis,” said Andrew J. Welch, FelCor's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

Portfolio Management:

For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we spent $10 million and $29 million, respectively, on capital improvements at our hotels (including our pro rata share of joint venture expenditures).

On August 17, we acquired the Fairmont Copley Plaza in Boston for $98.5 million from an affiliate of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts ("Fairmont"). This world-class icon is located on Copley Square in the heart of Boston's Back Bay neighborhood. The property has 383 guest rooms and suites and 23,000 square feet of meeting space. For the quarter, RevPAR for this hotel increased 8.6% and hotel EBITDA increased 33%, compared to the same period in 2009.

As part of our long-term strategic plan, we have begun a second phase of asset sales. During the third quarter, we began marketing the first 14 hotels, of which 11 are suburban or airport locations, and seven are located in Texas, Florida and Georgia. Additional hotels will be brought to market based on various factors and we will sell hotels only when we receive adequate pricing.

Outlook:

The lodging industry recovery is taking hold and RevPAR growth is accelerating, reflecting improved corporate transient and group demand and moderating supply growth. We expect this trend to continue, and also for our portfolio to maintain its superior market share as a result of our high-quality, diversified and renovated portfolio. Additionally, our hotels are affected less by new supply growth because the average number of rooms under construction in our markets is lower than the industry as a whole.

For 2010, we anticipate:

  RevPAR to increase between 3.75% and 4.5%;

Adjusted EBITDA to be between $182 million and $185 million;

Adjusted FFO per share to be between $(0.17) and $(0.13);

Net loss attributable to FelCor to be between $163 million and $160 million; and

Interest expense to be approximately $144 million.

Capital expenditures to be approximately $42 million.

Weighted average shares and units to be 80.9 million.

FelCor, a real estate investment trust, is the nation's largest owner of upper-upscale, all-suite hotels. FelCor owns interests in 84 hotels and resorts, located in 23 states and Canada. FelCor's diversified, high-quality portfolio is flagged under leading brands such as - Hilton®, Doubletree ®, Embassy Suites Hotels®, Marriott®, Renaissance®, Sheraton®, Westin®, Fairmont® and Holiday Inn®. Additional information can be found on the Company's Web site at www.felcor.com.

We invite you to listen to our third quarter earnings Conference Call on Wednesday, November 3, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. (Central Time). The conference call will be Webcast simultaneously on FelCor's Web site at www.felcor.com. Interested investors and other parties who wish to access the call should go to FelCor's Web site and click on the conference call microphone icon on either the “Investor Relations” or “News Releases” page. The conference call replay will be archived on the Company's Web site.

With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this news release include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “continue” and other similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions and forecasts of future results. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Numerous risks and uncertainties, and the occurrence of future events, may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated at the time the forward-looking statements are made. Current economic circumstances or an economic slowdown and the impact on the lodging industry, operating risks associated with the hotel business, relationships with our property managers, risks associated with our level of indebtedness and our ability to meet debt covenants in our debt agreements, our ability to complete acquisitions, dispositions and debt refinancing, the availability of capital, the impact on the travel industry from security precautions, our ability to continue to qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust for federal income tax purposes and numerous other factors may affect future results, performance and achievements. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are described in greater detail in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe our current expectations to be based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained or that actual results will not differ materially. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to conform the statement to actual results or changes in our expectations.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

INTRODUCTION

The following information is presented in order to help our investors understand FelCor's financial position as of and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

PAGE

Consolidated Statements of Operations(a)
6
Consolidated Balance Sheets(a)
7
Capital Expenditures
8
Supplemental Financial Data
8
Consolidated Debt Summary
9
Schedule of Encumbered Hotels
10
Hotel Portfolio Composition
11
Detailed Operating Statistics by Brand
12
Detailed Operating Statistics for FelCor's Top Markets
13
Non-GAAP Financial Measures

14

(a) Our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


 
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share data)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



2010   2009
2010   2009
Revenues:







Hotel operating revenue:







Room
$ 193,641

$ 178,795

$ 564,086

$ 539,949
Food and beverage
33,076

29,207

106,796

99,583
Other operating departments
15,227

14,258

43,055

42,484
Other revenue
1,421  
1,280  
2,793  
2,554  
Total revenues
243,365  
223,540  
716,730  
684,570  
Expenses:







Hotel departmental expenses:







Room
52,636

48,473

150,793

140,671
Food and beverage
27,830

25,657

84,623

80,647
Other operating departments
6,535

6,661

19,053

18,957
Other property related costs
69,894

63,778

201,701

191,961
Management and franchise fees
11,545

10,975

33,796

32,990
Taxes, insurance and lease expense
26,511

24,872

77,913

74,199
Corporate expenses
6,564

4,471

22,921

15,829
Depreciation and amortization
36,564

36,866

110,454

108,668
Impairment loss
65,849



79,245


Other expenses
1,331  
1,031  
2,693  
3,486  
Total operating expenses
305,259  
222,784  
783,192  
667,408  
Operating income (loss)
(61,894 )
756

(66,462 )
17,162
Interest expense, net
(35,147 )
(24,015 )
(107,678 )
(67,301 )
Extinguishment of debt
(225 )
 
45,853  
(594 )
Loss before equity in income (loss) from
unconsolidated entities

(97,266 )
(23,259 )
(128,287 )
(50,733 )
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
302

488

(886 )
(3,197 )
Gain on sale of assets
 
723  
 
723  
Loss from continuing operations
(96,964 )
(22,048 )
(129,173 )
(53,207 )
Discontinued operations
7,684  
(3,426 )
(1,059 )
(4,657 )
Net loss
(89,280 )
(25,474 )
(130,232 )
(57,864 )

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships


173

174

77

66
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling
interests in FelCor LP

297  
160  
571  
399  
Net loss attributable to FelCor
(88,810 )
(25,140 )
(129,584 )
(57,399 )
Preferred dividends
(9,678 )
(9,678 )
(29,034 )
(29,034 )
Net loss attributable to FelCor common stockholders
$ (98,488 )
$ (34,818 )
$ (158,618 )
$ (86,433 )
Basic and diluted per common share data:







Loss from continuing operations
$ (1.12 )
$ (0.50 )
$ (2.10 )
$ (1.30 )
Net loss
$ (1.04 )
$ (0.55 )
$ (2.11 )
$ (1.37 )
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares

outstanding


95,034  
63,086  
75,135  
63,121  

 
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)





 


September 30,
2010


December 31,
2009

Assets



Investment in hotels, net of accumulated depreciation of $970,730 at
September 30, 2010 and $916,604 at December 31, 2009

$ 2,101,244

$ 2,180,394
Investment in unconsolidated entities

102,957


82,040
Cash and cash equivalents

192,478


263,531
Restricted cash

20,586


18,708
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $326 at
September 30, 2010 and $406 at December 31, 2009


36,628


28,678
Deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of $15,811 at
September 30, 2010 and $14,502 at December 31, 2009


21,701


19,977
Other assets
  37,599  
  32,666  
Total assets
$ 2,513,193  
$ 2,625,994  
Liabilities and Equity



Debt, net of discount of $55,972 at September 30, 2010 and $64,267 at
December 31, 2009

$ 1,573,402

$ 1,773,314
Distributions payable

66,615


37,580
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  180,560  
  131,339  
Total liabilities
  1,820,577  
  1,942,233  
Commitments and contingencies



Redeemable noncontrolling interests in FelCor LP at redemption value, 295
units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009

  1,357  
  1,062  
Equity:



Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000 shares authorized:



Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, 12,880 shares,
liquidation value of $322,011, issued and outstanding at

September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009



309,362


309,362
Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 68 shares,
liquidation value of $169,950, issued and outstanding at

September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009



169,412


169,412

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized and 101,038 and
69,413 shares issued, including shares in treasury, at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively



1,010


694
Additional paid-in capital

2,189,418


2,021,837
Accumulated other comprehensive income

24,800


23,528
Accumulated deficit

(1,951,451 )

(1,792,822 )
Less: Common stock in treasury, at cost, of 3,988 shares at September 30,
2010 and 3,845 shares at December 31, 2009

  (72,245 )
  (71,895 )
Total FelCor stockholders’ equity

670,306


660,116
Noncontrolling interests in other partnerships
  20,953  
  22,583  
Total equity
  691,259  
  682,699  
Total liabilities and equity
$ 2,513,193  
$ 2,625,994  

 
 

Capital Expenditures

(in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Improvements and additions to majority-owned hotels
$ 9,448


16,926


27,841


62,465
Partners' pro rata share of additions to consolidated

joint venture hotels



(81 )

(381 )

(203 )

(758 )
Pro rata share of additions to unconsolidated hotels
  250  
  693  
  1,220  
  3,646  
Total additions to hotels(a)
$ 9,617  
$ 17,238  
$ 28,858  
$ 65,353  

(a) Includes capitalized interest, property taxes, ground leases and certain employee costs.


 
 

Supplemental Financial Data

(in thousands, except per share information)





 
Total Enterprise Value

September 30,
2010


December 31,
2009

Common shares outstanding
97,050
65,568
Units outstanding
295
295
Combined shares and units outstanding
97,345
65,863
Common stock price
$4.60
$3.60
Market capitalization
$447,787
$237,107
Series A preferred stock
309,362
309,362
Series C preferred stock
169,412
169,412
Consolidated debt
1,573,402
1,773,314
Noncontrolling interests of consolidated debt
(3,809)
(3,971)
Pro rata share of unconsolidated debt
78,199
107,481
Cash and cash equivalents
(192,478)
(263,531)
Total enterprise value (TEV)
$2,381,875
$2,329,174



 
 
 

Consolidated Debt Summary

(dollars in thousands)









 

Interest Rate (%)

Maturity Date

September 30,
2010


December 31,
2009

Mortgage debt







Mortgage debt L + 0.93 (a)
November 2011
$ 250,000

$ 250,000
Mortgage debt L + 5.10 (b)
April 2015

212,000


Mortgage debt L + 3.50 (c)
August 2011(d)

198,800


200,425
Mortgage debt 9.02

April 2014

114,306


117,422
Mortgage debt(e) 6.66

June - August 2014

69,606


70,917
Mortgage debt 8.77

May 2013

27,770


27,829
Mortgage debt(f) 8.62

May 2010

14,103


14,103
Mortgage debt 5.81

July 2016

11,429


11,741
Mortgage debt 6.15

June 2011

8,157


9,228
Other 4.25

May 2011

502


354
Senior notes







Senior secured notes(g) 10.00

October 2014

580,070


572,500
Senior notes 8.50 (h)
June 2011

86,659


86,604
Retired debt


   
  412,191
Total




$ 1,573,402  
$ 1,773,314

(a) We purchased an interest rate cap that caps LIBOR at 7.8% and expires November 2011 for a $250 million notional amount.

(b) LIBOR for this loan is subject to a 3% floor. We purchased an interest rate cap that caps LIBOR at 5.0% and expires May 2012 for a $212 million notional amount.

(c) LIBOR for this loan is subject to a 2% floor.

(d) This loan can be extended for as many as two years (to 2013), subject to satisfying certain conditions.

(e) The hotels securing this debt are subject to separate loan agreements and are not cross-collateralized.

(f) We are in the process of transferring this hotel to the lender in full satisfaction of the debt.

(g) These notes have $636 million in aggregate principal outstanding and were sold at a discount that provides an effective yield of 12.875% before transaction costs.

(h) As a result of a rating down-grade in February 2009, the interest rate on the 8½% senior notes increased to 9%.


 
 

Schedule of Encumbered Hotels

(dollars in millions)





 


September 30, 2010
Balance



Consolidated Debt

Encumbered Hotels
CMBS debt
  $ 250  

Anaheim - ES, Bloomington - ES, Charleston Mills

House - HI, Dallas DFW South - ES, Deerfield Beach - ES, Jacksonville - ES, Lexington - HS, Dallas Love Field - ES, Raleigh/Durham - DTGS, San Antonio Airport - HI, Tampa Rocky Point - DTGS and Phoenix Tempe - ES

Mortgage debt

$ 212


Atlanta Buckhead - ES, Atlanta Galleria - SS, Boston

Marlboro - ES, Burlington - SH, Corpus Christi - ES,

Ft. Lauderdale Cypress Creek - SS, Orlando South - ES, Philadelphia Society Hill - SH and South San Francisco - ES

Mortgage debt

$ 199


Charlotte SouthPark - DT, Houston Medical Center - HI, Myrtle Beach - HLT, Mandalay Beach - ES, Nashville Airport - ES, Philadelphia Independence Mall - HI, Pittsburgh University Center - HI, Santa Barbara, Goleta -HI and Santa Monica at the Pier - HI
Mortgage debt

$ 114


Baton Rouge - ES, Birmingham - ES, Ft. Lauderdale - ES, Miami Airport - ES, Milpitas - ES, Minneapolis Airport - ES and Napa Valley - ES
CMBS debt(a)

$ 70


Atlanta Airport - ES, Austin - DTGS, BWI Airport - ES, Orlando Airport - HI and Phoenix Biltmore - ES
CMBS debt

$ 28


New Orleans Convention Center - ES
CMBS debt

$ 14


Chicago Deerfield - ES
CMBS debt

$ 11


Indianapolis North - ES
CMBS debt

$ 8


Wilmington - DT
Senior secured notes

$ 580


Atlanta Airport - SH, Boston Beacon Hill - HI, Dallas Market Center - ES, Myrtle Beach Resort - ES, Nashville Opryland - Airport - HI, New Orleans French Quarter - HI, Orlando North - ES, Orlando Walt Disney World® - DTGS, San Diego on the Bay - HI, San Francisco Burlingame - ES, San Francisco Fisherman's Wharf - HI, San Francisco Union Square - MAR, Toronto Airport - HI and Toronto

Yorkdale - HI

(a) The hotels under this debt are subject to separate loan agreements and are not cross-collateralized.

Hotel Portfolio Composition

The following table illustrates the distribution of 82 same-store consolidated hotels (excluding the Fairmont Copley Plaza acquired in August 2010) by brand, market and location at September 30, 2010.

Brand


  Hotels   Rooms  

% of Total
Rooms

 

% of 2009
Hotel
EBITDA(a)

Embassy Suites Hotels
46
11,911
50
60
Holiday Inn
15
5,154
22
18
Sheraton and Westin
9
3,217
14
9
Doubletree
7
1,471
6
7
Renaissance and Marriott
3
1,321
6
3
Hilton
2
559
2
3








 

Market










South Florida
5
1,439
6
8
Los Angeles area
4
899
4
6
Atlanta
5
1,462
6
6
Orlando
4
1,038
4
4
Philadelphia
2
729
3
4
Minneapolis
3
736
3
4
San Francisco area
6
2,138
9
4
Dallas
4
1,333
6
4
Central California Coast
2
408
2
4
San Antonio
3
874
4
3
Myrtle Beach
2
640
3
3
Boston
2
532
2
3
San Diego
1
600
3
3
Other

39


10,805


45


44









 

Location










Suburban
34
8,560
36
32
Urban
20
6,358
27
27
Airport
18
5,788
25
24
Resort
10
2,927
12
17

(a) Hotel EBITDA is more fully described on page 22.

The following tables set forth occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the percentage changes thereto between the periods presented, for 82 same-store consolidated hotels owned for both periods (excludes the Fairmont Copley Plaza acquired in August 2010).

Detailed Operating Statistics by Brand


Occupancy (%)

Three Months Ended
September 30,


 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

2010   2009
%Variance
2010   2009
%Variance
Embassy Suites Hotels 73.6
70.0
5.2

73.2
69.1
5.9
Holiday Inn 75.3
73.8
2.1

73.3
69.4
5.6
Sheraton and Westin 66.3
63.6
4.4

66.3
61.0
8.7
Doubletree 74.8
67.5
10.8

74.0
66.2
11.7
Renaissance and Marriott 62.7
66.9
(6.2 )
65.3
61.7
5.8
Hilton 80.3
77.1
4.2

66.6
65.1
2.3











 
Total hotels 72.7
69.8
4.2

71.7
67.4
6.5











 

ADR ($)

Three Months Ended
September 30,



Nine Months Ended
September 30,




2010
2009
%Variance
2010
2009
%Variance
Embassy Suites Hotels 123.56
123.60


125.40
129.86
(3.4 )
Holiday Inn 119.41
113.79
4.9

113.82
113.22
0.5
Sheraton and Westin 104.07
100.86
3.2

105.69
109.39
(3.4 )
Doubletree 113.11
114.00
(0.8 )
116.33
125.87
(7.6 )
Renaissance and Marriott 142.59
130.99
8.9

165.27
164.91
0.2
Hilton 142.27
128.93
10.4

124.76
118.12
5.6











 
Total hotels 120.85
118.42
2.1

121.60
124.72
(2.5 )











 

RevPAR ($)

Three Months Ended
September 30,



Nine Months Ended
September 30,




2010
2009
%Variance
2010
2009
%Variance
Embassy Suites Hotels 90.98
86.49
5.2

91.77
89.71
2.3
Holiday Inn 89.98
83.95
7.2

83.45
78.60
6.2
Sheraton and Westin 69.05
64.11
7.7

70.04
66.70
5.0
Doubletree 84.60
76.95
9.9

86.02
83.32
3.2
Renaissance and Marriott 89.47
87.58
2.2

107.90
101.79
6.0
Hilton 114.20
99.34
15.0

83.12
76.89
8.1











 
Total hotels 87.83
82.64
6.3

87.25
84.05
3.8

 

Detailed Operating Statistics for FelCor's Top Markets



 


Occupancy (%)


Three Months Ended
September 30,

 
 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 


2010   2009
%Variance
2010   2009
%Variance
South Florida
72.4
67.2
7.8

77.7
73.3
6.0
Los Angeles area
79.5
75.7
5.1

75.9
72.9
4.2
Atlanta
74.7
72.9
2.5

75.0
70.8
5.9
Orlando
66.5
69.8
(4.7 )
73.7
73.6
0.2
Philadelphia
79.2
72.5
9.2

73.4
65.6
11.9
Minneapolis
82.9
77.8
6.4

75.5
68.2
10.8
San Francisco area
83.2
81.6
1.9

75.8
69.5
9.1
Dallas
64.2
58.2
10.2

65.3
59.5
9.8
Central California Coast
83.1
81.0
2.6

77.8
78.2
(0.5 )
San Antonio
77.9
74.7
4.3

76.5
72.8
5.1
Myrtle Beach
82.7
80.0
3.4

66.9
66.1
1.2
Boston
84.6
84.4
0.3

82.3
78.4
5.0
San Diego   82.6   76.9   7.3     77.7   71.7   8.3  


ADR ($)


Three Months Ended
September 30,




Nine Months Ended
September 30,





2010
2009
%Variance
2010
2009
%Variance
South Florida
100.25
100.94
(0.7 )
127.84
132.67
(3.6 )
Los Angeles area
146.10
141.69
3.1

138.45
138.03
0.3
Atlanta
104.34
102.90
1.4

104.23
106.24
(1.9 )
Orlando
95.50
94.42
1.1

106.27
113.72
(6.6 )
Philadelphia
128.12
127.29
0.7

124.93
133.86
(6.7 )
Minneapolis
126.95
128.35
(1.1 )
126.36
129.03
(2.1 )
San Francisco area
144.56
132.57
9.0

133.03
127.32
4.5
Dallas
106.94
108.58
(1.5 )
110.27
116.83
(5.6 )
Central California Coast
189.59
188.12
0.8

163.34
160.45
1.8
San Antonio
98.46
102.64
(4.1 )
98.45
104.75
(6.0 )
Myrtle Beach
166.08
159.11
4.4

142.90
139.57
2.4
Boston
148.27
138.86
6.8

137.49
134.62
2.1
San Diego   123.95   123.11   0.7     119.28   127.37   (6.4 )


RevPAR ($)


Three Months Ended
September 30,




Nine Months Ended
September 30,





2010
2009
%Variance
2010
2009
%Variance
South Florida
72.61
67.82
7.1

99.29
97.21
2.1
Los Angeles area
116.19
107.26
8.3

105.10
100.57
4.5
Atlanta
77.89
74.98
3.9

78.12
75.18
3.9
Orlando
63.50
65.87
(3.6 )
78.37
83.67
(6.3 )
Philadelphia
101.42
92.26
9.9

91.69
87.76
4.5
Minneapolis
105.20
99.92
5.3

95.46
87.96
8.5
San Francisco area
120.31
108.24
11.2

100.86
88.52
13.9
Dallas
68.67
63.25
8.6

71.98
69.48
3.6
Central California Coast
157.51
152.39
3.4

127.04
125.43
1.3
San Antonio
76.72
76.70


75.28
76.22
(1.2 )
Myrtle Beach
137.31
127.24
7.9

95.58
92.29
3.6
Boston
125.51
117.14
7.1

113.20
105.51
7.3
San Diego   102.33   94.72   8.0     92.64   91.36   1.4  














 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We refer in this release to certain “non-GAAP financial measures.” These measures, including FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin, are measures of our financial performance that are not calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The following tables reconcile each of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Immediately following the reconciliations, we include a discussion of why we believe these measures are useful supplemental measures of our performance and the limitations of such measures.


 
 

Reconciliation of Net Loss to FFO and Adjusted FFO

(in thousands, except per share data)





 


Three Months Ended September 30,


2010
2009  


Dollars   Shares   Per Share Amount
Dollars   Shares   Per Share Amount
Net loss
$ (89,280 )




$ (25,474 )



Noncontrolling interests

470





334




Preferred dividends
  (9,678 )




(9,678 )



Net loss attributable to FelCor

common stockholders



(98,488 )
95,034
(1.04 )
(34,818 )
63,086
(0.55 )
Depreciation and amortization

36,564


0.38

36,866


0.58
Depreciation, discontinued operations
and unconsolidated entities


3,966


0.04

4,726


0.07
Noncontrolling interests in FelCor LP

(297 )
295
0.01

(160 )
296

Conversion of options and unvested restricted stock


   

 
    445
 
FFO

(58,255 )
95,329
(0.61 )
6,614

63,827
0.10
Impairment loss

65,849


0.69





Impairment loss, discontinued operations

and unconsolidated entities








2,080


0.04
Acquisition costs

403








Extinguishment of debt

(8,036 )

(0.08 )




Conversion costs(a)






117



Severance costs






41



Lease termination costs
   

 
117  

 
Adjusted FFO
$ (39 )
95,329
 
$ 8,969  
63,827
$ 0.14  

(a) Costs related to the conversion of our San Francisco Union Square hotel to a Marriott.


 

Reconciliation of Net Loss to FFO and Adjusted FFO

(in thousands, except per share data)



 


Nine Months Ended September 30,


2010     2009  


Dollars   Shares  

Per Share
Amount


Dollars Shares  

Per Share
Amount

Net loss
$ (130,232 )




$ (57,864 )



Noncontrolling interests

648





465




Preferred dividends
  (29,034 )




(29,034 )



Net loss attributable to FelCor
common stockholders


(158,618 )
75,135
$ (2.11 )
(86,433 )
63,121
$ (1.37 )
Depreciation and amortization

110,454


1.47

108,668


1.72
Depreciation, discontinued operations
and unconsolidated entities


12,060


0.16

14,254


0.23
Gain on sale of unconsolidated subsidiary

(559 )

(0.01 )




Noncontrolling interests in FelCor LP

(571 )
295


(399 )
296
(0.01 )
Conversion of options and unvested
restricted stock

   

 
    284
 
FFO

(37,234 )
75,430
(0.49 )
36,090

63,701
0.57
Impairment loss

79,245


1.05





Impairment loss, discontinued operations
and unconsolidated entities


7,664


0.10

5,516


0.08
Acquisition costs

419


0.01





Extinguishment of debt

(54,096 )

(0.72 )
594


0.01
Conversion costs(a)






447


0.01
Severance costs






550


0.01
Lease termination costs
   

 
469  

0.01  
Adjusted FFO
$ (4,002 )
75,430
$ (0.05 )
$ 43,666  
63,701
$ 0.69  

(a) Costs related to the conversion of our San Francisco Union Square hotel to a Marriott.


 
 

Reconciliation of Net Loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

(in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Net loss
$ (89,280 )
$ (25,474 )
$ (130,232 )
$ (57,864 )
Depreciation and amortization

36,564


36,866


110,454


108,668

Depreciation, discontinued operations and unconsolidated entities



3,966


4,726


12,060


14,254
Interest expense

35,251


24,244


107,985


67,874

Interest expense, discontinued operations and unconsolidated entities



1,627


1,249


5,219




4,007
Amortization of stock compensation

1,644


1,122


4,901


3,924
Noncontrolling interests in other partnerships
  173  
  174  
  77  
  66  
EBITDA

(10,055 )

42,907


110,464


140,929
Impairment loss

65,849





79,245



Impairment loss, discontinued operations and unconsolidated entities






2,080


7,664


5,516
Extinguishment of debt

(8,036 )




(54,096 )

594
Acquisition costs

403





419



Conversion costs(a)




117





447
Severance costs




41





550
Lease termination costs




117





469
Gain on sale of unconsolidated subsidiary
   
   
  (559 )
   
Adjusted EBITDA
$ 48,161  
$ 45,262  
$ 143,137  
$ 148,505  

(a) Costs related to the conversion of our San Francisco Union Square hotel to a Marriott.


 
 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Hotel EBITDA

(in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Adjusted EBITDA
$ 48,161

$ 45,262

$ 143,137

$ 148,505
Other revenue

(1,421 )

(1,280 )

(2,793 )

(2,554 )
Adjusted EBITDA from acquired hotels

(1,520 )




(1,520 )


Equity in income from unconsolidated subsidiaries

(excluding interest, depreciation and impairment expense)



(5,816 )

(5,558 )

(15,425 )

(14,519 )

Noncontrolling interests in other partnerships (excluding interest, depreciation and severance expense)



424


454


1,751


1,899
Consolidated hotel lease expense

11,827


10,893


33,090
 

31,805
Unconsolidated taxes, insurance and lease expense

(1,801 )

(2,024 )

(5,555 )

(6,041 )
Interest income

(104 )

(229 )

(307 )

(573 )

Other expenses (excluding conversion costs, severance costs and lease termination costs)



928


751


2,274


2,040

Corporate expenses (excluding amortization expense of stock compensation)



4,920


3,349


18,020


11,905
Gain on sale of asset




(723 )




(723 )
Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations
  (99 )
  (182 )
  (599 )
  (3,389 )

Hotel EBITDA


$ 55,499  
$ 50,713  
$ 172,073  
$ 168,355  

 
 

Reconciliation of Net Loss to Hotel EBITDA

(in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Net loss
$ (89,280 )
$ (25,474 )
$ (130,232 )
$ (57,864 )
Discontinued operations

(7,684 )

3,426


1,059


4,657
Adjusted EBITDA from acquired hotels

(1,520 )




(1,520 )


Equity in loss (income) from unconsolidated entities

(302 )

(488 )

886


3,197
Consolidated hotel lease expense

11,827


10,893


33,090


31,805
Unconsolidated taxes, insurance and lease expense

(1,801 )

(2,024 )

(5,555 )

(6,041 )
Interest expense, net

35,147


24,015


107,678


67,301
Extinguishment of debt

225





(45,853 )

594
Corporate expenses

6,564


4,471


22,921


15,829
Depreciation and amortization

36,564


36,866


110,454


108,668
Impairment loss

65,849





79,245



Gain on sale of assets




(723 )




(723 )
Other expenses

1,331


1,031


2,693


3,486
Other revenue
  (1,421 )
  (1,280 )
  (2,793 )
  (2,554 )
Hotel EBITDA
$ 55,499  
$ 50,713  
$ 172,073  
$ 168,355  

 
 

Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA Margin

(dollars in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Total revenues
$ 243,365

$ 223,540

$ 716,730

$ 684,570
Other revenue
  (1,421 )
  (1,280 )
  (2,793 )
  (2,554 )
Hotel operating revenue

241,944


222,260


713,937


682,016
Less: revenue from acquired hotels
  (5,673 )
   
  (5,673 )
   
Same-store hotel operating revenue

236,271


222,260


708,264


682,016
Same-store hotel operating expenses
  (180,772 )
  (171,547 )
  (536,191 )
  (513,661 )

Hotel EBITDA


$ 55,499  
$ 50,713  
$ 172,073  
$ 168,355  
Hotel EBITDA margin(a)

23.5 %

22.8 %

24.3 %

24.7 %

(a) Hotel EBITDA as a percentage of same-store hotel operating revenue.


 
 

Reconciliation of Total Operating Expenses to Same-Store Hotel Operating Expenses

(dollars in thousands)





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



  2010       2009  
  2010       2009  
Total operating expenses
$ 305,259

$ 222,784

$ 783,192

$ 667,408
Unconsolidated taxes, insurance and lease expense

1,801


2,024


5,555


6,041
Consolidated hotel lease expense

(11,827 )

(10,893 )

(33,090 )

(31,805 )
Corporate expenses

(6,564 )

(4,471 )

(22,921 )

(15,829 )
Depreciation and amortization

(36,564 )

(36,866 )

(110,454 )

(108,668 )
Impairment loss

(65,849 )




(79,245 )


Acquired hotel expenses

(4,153 )




(4,153 )


Other expenses
  (1,331 )
  (1,031 )
  (2,693 )
  (3,486 )
Same-store hotel operating expenses
$ 180,772  
$ 171,547  
$ 536,191  
$ 513,661  

 
 

Reconciliation of Ratio of Operating Income (Loss) to Total Revenues to Hotel EBITDA Margin





 


Three Months Ended
September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,



2010     2009  
2010     2009  
Ratio of operating income (loss) to total revenues
(25.4 )%
0.3 %
(9.3 )%
2.5 %
Other revenue
(0.6 )
(0.6 )
(0.4 )
(0.4 )
Revenue from acquired hotels
(2.9 )


(0.7 )

Unconsolidated taxes, insurance and lease expense
(0.8 )
(0.9 )
(0.8 )
(0.9 )
Consolidated hotel lease expense
5.0

4.9

4.7

4.6
Other expenses
0.6

0.6

0.4

0.7
Corporate expenses
2.8

2.0

3.2

2.3
Depreciation and amortization
15.4

16.5

15.5

15.9
Impairment loss
27.7



11.1


Expenses from acquired hotels
1.7  
 
0.6  
 
Hotel EBITDA margin
23.5 %
22.8 %
24.3 %
24.7 %

 

Reconciliation of Forecasted Net Loss Attributable to FelCor to Forecasted Adjusted FFO and

Adjusted EBITDA

(in millions, except per share and unit data)



 


Full Year 2010 Guidance


Low Guidance   High Guidance


Dollars  

Per Share
Amount(a)


Dollars  

Per Share
Amount(a)

Net loss attributable to FelCor
$ (163 )


$ (160 )

Preferred dividends
  (39 )


  (39 )

Net loss attributable to FelCor common stockholders

(202 )
$ (2.53 )

(199 )
$ (2.49 )
Depreciation(b)

163




163


Gain on sale of assets

(1 )



(1 )

Noncontrolling interests in FelCor LP
  (1 )


  (1 )

FFO

(41 )
$ (0.51 )

(38 )
$ (0.47 )
Impairment

87




87


Extinguishment of debt
  (60 )


  (60 )

Adjusted FFO
$ (14 )
$ (0.17 )
$ (11 )
$ (0.13 )








 
Net loss attributable to FelCor
$ (163 )


$ (160 )

Depreciation(b)

163




163


Interest expense(b)

150




150


Amortization expense

7




7


Noncontrolling interests in FelCor LP
  (1 )


  (1 )

EBITDA

156




159


Impairment

87




87


Extinguishment of debt

(60 )



(60 )

Gain on sale of assets
  (1 )


  (1 )

Adjusted EBITDA
$ 182  


$ 185  

(a) Weighted average shares and units are 80.9 million.

(b) Includes pro rata portion of unconsolidated entities.

Substantially all of our non-current assets consist of real estate. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most industry investors consider supplemental measures of performance, which are not measures of operating performance under GAAP, to be helpful in evaluating a real estate company's operations. These supplemental measures, including FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin, are not measures of operating performance under GAAP. However, we consider these non-GAAP measures to be supplemental measures of a hotel REIT's performance and should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income (loss) attributable to FelCor as a measure of our operating performance.

FFO and EBITDA

The White Paper on Funds From Operations approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), defines FFO as net income or loss attributable to parent (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by NAREIT. This may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.

EBITDA is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries. We define EBITDA as net income or loss attributable to parent (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus interest expenses, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect EBITDA on the same basis.

Adjustments to FFO and EBITDA

We adjust FFO and EBITDA when evaluating our performance because management believes that the exclusion of certain additional recurring and non-recurring items, including but not limited to these described below, provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance and that the presentation of Adjusted FFO, and Adjusted EBITDA when combined with GAAP net income attributable to FelCor, EBITDA and FFO, is beneficial to an investor's better understanding of our operating performance.

  • Gains and losses related to extinguishment of debt and interest rate swaps - We exclude gains and losses related to extinguishment of debt and interest rate swaps from FFO and EBITDA because we believe that it is not indicative of ongoing operating performance of our hotel assets. This also represents an acceleration of interest expense or a reduction of interest expense, and interest expense is excluded from EBITDA.
  • Impairment losses - We exclude the effect of impairment losses and gains or losses on disposition of assets in computing Adjusted FFO and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe that including these is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. Additionally, we believe that impairment charges and gains or losses on disposition of assets represent accelerated depreciation, or excess depreciation, and depreciation is excluded from FFO by the NAREIT definition and from EBITDA.
  • Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - Infrequently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statements of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments in computing Adjusted FFO and Adjusted EBITDA because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

In addition, to derive Adjusted EBITDA we exclude gains or losses on the sale of depreciable assets because we believe that including them in EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. Additionally, the gain or loss on sale of depreciable assets represents either accelerated depreciation or excess depreciation in previous periods, and depreciation is excluded from EBITDA.

Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA Margin

Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin are commonly used measures of performance in the hotel industry and give investors a more complete understanding of the operating results over which our individual hotels and operating managers have direct control. We believe that Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin are useful to investors by providing greater transparency with respect to two significant measures used by us in our financial and operational decision-making. Additionally, using these measures facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. We present Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin by eliminating from continuing operations all revenues and expenses not directly associated with hotel operations including but not limited to corporate-level expenses; impairment losses; gains or losses on disposition of assets; and gains and losses related to extinguishment of debt. We eliminate corporate-level costs and expenses because we believe property-level results provide investors with supplemental information into the ongoing operational performance of our hotels and the effectiveness of management on a property-level basis. We exclude the effect of impairment losses, gains or losses on disposition of assets, and gains or losses related to extinguishment of debt because we believe that including these is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. We also eliminate consolidated percentage rent paid to unconsolidated entities, which is effectively eliminated by noncontrolling interests and equity in income from unconsolidated subsidiaries, and include the cost of unconsolidated taxes, insurance and lease expense, to reflect the entire operating costs applicable to our hotels. Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margins are presented on a same-store basis.

Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures

Our management and Board of Directors use FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin to evaluate the performance of our hotels and to facilitate comparisons between us and lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital intensive companies. We use Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin in evaluating hotel-level performance and the operating efficiency of our hotel managers.

The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin, as presented by us, may not be comparable to the same measures as calculated by other real estate companies. These measures do not reflect certain expenses that we incurred and will incur, such as depreciation and interest or capital expenditures. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our reconciliations to the GAAP financial measures, and our consolidated statements of operations and cash flows, include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as, the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures.

These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit, cash flow from operations, or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. Neither should FFO, Adjusted FFO, Adjusted FFO per share, EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA be considered as measures of our liquidity or indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. Adjusted FFO per share should not be used as a measure of amounts that accrue directly to the benefit of stockholders. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA margin reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. Management strongly encourages investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.