News for the Hospitality Executive
Is Leverage Dead or Just Deadly -- a Controversial New
Investment Reality Nay be Taking Hold
By Jim Butler - May 20, 2009
If it is available, you want leverage to increase your yield, right? Not so fast, says a new study that may amaze you!
We are in a credit crunch, so we expect a dearth of leverage, even if it is painful. The new reality is part of complete "reset" our economy and investment approach must accommodate before we can recover. The extent of this reset may surprise and appall you as revealed by the industry leaders at our recent conference. But John Arabia's new thesis is even more amazing.
First, the new reality:
A surprising new study that leverage is deadly
John V. Arabia, Managing Director of Green Street Advisors, is a very bright guy. I remember him as the industry leader who first figured out that with the massive equity, and vast cheap debt being controlled by the private equity guys, literally every hotel company in America was potentially up for purchase. Less than 6 months later, Blackstone bought Hilton.
Then, he figured out the correlation between airline seat capacity and hotel room demand (.3 to 1.0), and predicted the significant hit the hotel industry would take from the spiraling airline industry cutbacks.
On May 7, 2009, at Meet the Money® 2009, he gave us his latest proposition, and perhaps one of the most controversial: Over the long term, investment yield varies inversely to leverage. Yes, the unlevered investments fared best, trailed by investments with moderate leverage, and finally dogged by the more heavily leverged investments.
Here is the important slide demonstrating the results of analysis over a complete investment cycle from the end of the credit crunch in about 1993 to the middle of the current one in 2009. John says that these credit crisis cycles tend to happen about every 17 or 18 years.
The general expectation is that moderate leverage creates higher returns.
This chart shows that companies with lower leverage outperformed those with moderate leverage, which again outperformed those without high leverage.
The cost of distress created by a capital crunch every 17 or 18 years is so great that it wipes out the benefits. As to just avoiding the last most excessive years of a cycle, John says that is a little like thinking you can time the stock market to call the top or the bottom. But even more importantly, Johns says the same conclusion would have applied if you marked performance in 2006 -- before the credit crash, or if you took ten year periods in the middle.
"Over the last 15 years, every 100 basis point increase in leverage has been accompanied by a 40 basis point decrease in annual returns," says Arabia.
The implications are profound. More importantly, according to John, Institutional investors now believe the there is a direct correlation between increased leverage and decreased annual returns. They have been speaking about this for several weeks. They will demand lower leverage. Before we saw 40-50% leverage in REITs. John says, "We firmly believe that the REIT of tomorrow will operate on 20-25% leverage."
This means a massive re-equitization of the public equity markets. This has already begun. HOST, and LaSalle have gone to the markets already. What does that mean for the rest of us?
View John Arabia's entire slide show from Meet the Money: "State of the Public Equity Markets - Lodging & REIT Sectors".
What does all this mean about leverage?
For a while, the only leverage we have to worry about is resetting the levels of leverage to much lower levels. But Arabia's provocative study suggests something that has been unheard of in most real estate circles. Most real estate investors use an unlevered return to make apples-to-apples comparisons of properties, taking out particular costs of debt or availability at a given time. Most of them would never think of an unlevered investment providing a higher yield.
Could this be a new reality for us?
In another session, I found the comment of Ambrose Fisher, Managing
Director or Oaktree Capital, to reflect the more traditional view, even
if done with tongue-in-cheek. Commenting on the low debt levels that are
being talked about, Ambrose said, "This is America. Ultimately greed takes
over . . . Leverage will go up eventually."
Jim Butler is a founding partner of JMBM and Chairman of its Global Hospitality Group®. Jim is one of the top hospitality attorneys in the world. GOOGLE "hotel lawyer" and you will see why. JMBM's troubled asset team has handled more than 1,000 receiverships and many complex insolvency issues. But Jim and his team are more than "just" great hotel lawyers. They are also hospitality consultants and business advisors. For example, they have developed some unique proprietary approaches to unlock value in underwater hotels that can benefit lenders, borrowers and investors. (GOOGLE "JMBM's SAVE program".) Whether it is a troubled investment or new transaction, JMBM's Global Hospitality Group® creates legal and business solutions for hotel owners and lenders. They are deal makers. They can help find the right operator or capital provider. They know who to call and how to reach them.
Chairman, Global Hospitality Group
Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4308
(310) 201-3526 direct
|Also See:||New Hotel Data and Revised Predictions for 2009; Increased Hotel Loan Stress, Falling NOI and Slumping values / It's Going to Get Worse Before it Gets Better / Jim Butler / March 2009|