Timeshare Closing Company
Marriott Timeshare Timeshare Advice
Timeshare Realty Marriott Timeshare Rentals
 
Hotel Online
News for the Hospitality Executive


 


Three Marriott Time-share Salespeople Claim They Were
Passed Over for Promotions and Harassed Because of
Their Age, Seek $75 million in Damages
By Jerry W. Jackson, The Orlando Sentinel, Fla.
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News 

October 7, 2005 - Three Marriott time-share salespeople who say they were passed over for promotions and harassed because of their age are battling the company in federal court in San Francisco.

Kelly Armstrong, a lawyer representing the employees -- two of whom no longer work for Marriott -- said Thursday they will seek at least $75 million in damages in the age-discrimination case.

If enough current or former Marriott workers come forward with similar claims, Armstrong said, the suit would be refiled to seek class-action status.

"This is a call to arms," Armstrong said during a telephone conference about the case, which was filed about a year ago but refiled with amendments on Thursday. "What Marriott did was wrong, and we want to send a message."

John Wolf, a spokesman for Marriott International, said: "We believe the case has no merit." The company's time-share division, Marriott Vacation Club, is based in Orlando.

The employees -- all older than 60 -- allege in the lawsuit that their efforts to be promoted were rebuffed and they were subjected to age-related jokes or comments by a younger supervisor. "Younger, lesser qualified applicants were repeatedly chosen for promotions," the suit contends, and the supervisor made it clear he preferred, "young, hip, good looking" employees.

"I couldn't sleep at night," said former Marriott employee Richard Kittner, now 61 and living in Orange County, Calif. He said he was forced to leave the company when he filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Armstrong said the two other plaintiffs, Victoria Roger-Vasselin, 63, of San Francisco, and Kenneth Arrick, 65, of Scottsdale, Ariz., also were "retaliated" against when they complained about their treatment.

Armstrong said that, while it is not illegal for a company to promote or show a preference for employees who are considered "hip" or "good looking," those preferences constituted "part of a pattern" of discrimination in this case. She said the supervisor named as a defendant is no longer western regional vice president of Marriott Vacation Club International but holds a similar position with the Ritz Carlton Club in California.

-----

To see more of The Orlando Sentinel -- including its homes, jobs, cars and other classified listings -- or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.OrlandoSentinel.com. 

Copyright (c) 2005, The Orlando Sentinel, Fla.

Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com. 



To search Hotel Online data base of News and Trends Go to Hotel.OnlineSearch
Home | Welcome| Hospitality News | Classifieds| Catalogs& Pricing |
Viewpoint Forum | Ideas&Trends | Press Releases
Please contact Hotel.Onlinewith your comments and suggestions.