Hotel Online  Special Report

advertisements
,
.
2005 Hotel Budget Season
.
by: Robert Mandelbaum, October 2004

In addition to conventions, leaves, and football, the fall season for most U.S. hotel managers is the time to prepare next year’s budget. After developing the marketing plan, which determines the revenue for the year, the controllers and department heads take over the process to add in the operating expenses. After review by several layers within the management company, the entire document is ultimately presented to the owner for final approval.

Together, the marketing plan and budget provide guidance in the following areas:

  • A review of the past year’s marketing efforts and operational activities
  • An action plan for the marketing department
  • Support for purchases made by department heads in the upcoming year
  • Capital expenditures
  • Staffing and hiring
  • Compensation quotas and goals
  • Future profitability
To assist U.S. hotel managers in preparing their 2005 marketing plans and budgets, PKF Consulting offers some insight into the following areas:
  • A historical review of budgeting accuracy
  • A forecast of major lodging market performance in 2005
  • An analysis of hotel operating expenses


2003 – Not What Was Expected

From PKF Consulting’s Trends in the Hotel Industry database of 4,000 hotel financial statements for 2003, we identified approximately 1,000 statements that contained 2003 budget data. Based on these statements, we compared the revenues and expenses budgeted for 2003 with what was actually earned and spent.

Heading into last year, most U.S. hotel managers were clearly optimistic that 2003 would be a year of recovery after the dramatic declines of 2001 and 2002. Unfortunately, as has been well documented, the spring 2003 war in Iraq, along with other economic factors, delayed the start of the industry’s recovery until later in the year. The disparity between the hopefulness felt in the fall of 2002 and the reality now observed from 2004 becomes very evident when comparing actual versus budgeted hotel performance for 2003.
.

Budget Accuracy 2003
Budget vs Actual
(Percent Change From 2002-2003)

Note: *-Before deducting capital reserves, rent, interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
Source: The Hospitality Research Group

Starting at the top of the income statement, we see the hotels in our sample budgeting for a 9.4 percent increase in total revenue in 2003. This projection was based on an expected 5.7 percent increase in occupancy, as well as a 3.0 percent rise in room rates. While a second-half recovery did offset most of the first-half loss in occupied rooms, hotel managers continued to discount their rooms throughout the year. The actual results for 2003 were a slight decline (0.1 percent) in occupancy combined with a 2.2 drop in average rate. Ultimately, the hotels in our sample experienced a 2.5 percent decline in total revenue, far off the 9.4 percent increase planned for in the 2003 budget.

Expecting revenues to grow 9.4 percent, hotel managers budgeted for a 5.4 percent increase in operating expenses in 2003. With revenues planned to grow greater than expenses, the hotel budgets called for a tremendous 23.5 percent increase in operating profits for the year. Operating profits are defined as income before deducting capital reserves, rent, interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

With the number of rooms occupied and total revenue actually declining, hotel managers did refrain from spending the dollars allotted in their 2003 budget. However, by the end of the year, operating expenses at the hotels in our sample did increase 0.3 percent. Therefore, with revenues declining and expenses increasing slightly, actual profitability fell off 12.5 percent in 2003. Again, this compares to an optimistic budget calling for a 23.5 percent increase in profits for the year.

What’s Expected In 2005?

Most U.S. hotel owners, operators, and analysts (our firm included) expect the industry growth experienced in 2004 to continue in 2005. Barring a catastrophic event, the Summer 2004 edition of our Hotel Outlook calls for a 6.8 percent increase in RevPAR in 2005. This is the result of a projected 2.6 percent gain in occupancy and a 4.1 percent increase in ADR.
.

2005 Forecast
Major US Markets*
Change from 2004

Note: * Based on HRG/TWR Summer 2004 forecast for chain-affiliated hotels.
Sources: The Hospitality Research Group, Torto Wheaton Research 
.
Hotel Outlook is an econometric forecast jointly developed by The Hospitality Research Group of PKF Consulting and Torto Wheaton Research. The model forecasts the performance of chain-affiliated hotels in the nation’s largest markets.

Both full-service and limited-service hotels are forecast to achieve relatively strong gains in RevPAR in 2005. However, market conditions dictate that each segment will achieve their RevPAR increase by employing different yield management strategies. In general, limited-service hotels should enjoy a greater increase in occupancy compared to their full-service counterparts. On the other hand, full-service hotel managers are expected to be more successful in raising room rates than limited-service operators.

Expense Control To Dictate Profitability

Given the optimistic outlook for hotel revenues, it would be expected that hotel profits grow at a similar pace. This position is bolstered by the fact that RevPAR gains in 2005 should be more heavily influenced by growth in ADR, as opposed to gains in occupancy. Traditionally, hotel profits show their greatest gains when revenue growth is dominated by rate growth.

A key to maximizing profitability gains will be the discipline of hotel management to maintain control over the costs for which they have some degree of influence. Unfortunately, hotel operators, historically, have not demonstrated an ability to control costs during periods of recovery. Separate research conducted by HRG reveals that coming out of industry recessions, hotel managers have spent money at a pace greater than the growth of revenues, and/or at a pace greater than inflation. These practices have limited the bottom-line benefit one would expect to receive from increases in revenue.

The following chart lists the relative growth of hotel revenues and expenses in the three years following historical U.S. economic recessions.
.


Note: *As defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research
Source: The Hospitality Research Group of PKF Consulting
.
We have already begun to take notice of expense creep in certain areas of hotel income statements. At 45.3 percent of all operating expenses, labor and related costs represent the largest expense item for hotels. Therefore, they have the greatest influence on hotel profitability. After two years of declining labor costs in 2001 and 2002, these costs increased 3.1 percent in 2003. PKF Consulting projects labor and related costs to increase another 5.0 percent in 2004. While the increase in labor costs do reflect the increased staffing required to service the increase in occupied rooms, management should think about the necessity to restore positions cut during the recession.

Fortunately, most operating expenses moved in relative proportion to revenues in 2003. The exceptions were the expenditures made for maintenance, utilities, and insurance, all of which increased "above average". Arguably, hotel managers have limited control over their expenditures for energy and insurance. In addition, hotels should also avoid deferred maintenance. It is hoped that managers have the discipline to continue effectively controlling fixed and variable expenses in 2005.

Given the projected increases in revenue and occupied rooms, as well as historical expense trends, PKF Consulting is estimating hotel operating expenses to increase approximately 5.0 percent from 2004 to 2005. With revenues forecast to increase approximately 7.0 percent, this should result in the average hotel achieving a 10 to 12 percent gain in profits in 2005.

* * *

Robert Mandelbaum is the Director of Research Information Services for the Hospitality Research Group of PKF Consulting (HRG). To learn more about the hotel budgeting tools developed by HRG, please contact Claude Vargo at claude.vargo@pkfc.com or (404) 842-1150, ext 237.
 

 
Contact:

Robert Mandelbaum
Director of Research Information Services
The Hospitality Research Group
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 580
Atlanta, GA 30326
(404) 842-1150, ext 223
robert.mandelbaum@pkfc.com
www.pkfc.com

.

Also See: Predictive Powers of Hotel Cycles / John B. Corgel / August 2004
Maintaining the Marketing Investment; Examing How U.S. Hotels Answered the Marketing Investment Question During the Industry Recession / Robert Mandelbaum / May 2004
Is the Hotel Industry Smart Enough to Avoid Overbuilding; Ten Reasons Why Real Estate Markets Become Overbuilt / Jack B. Corgel / July 2004
Hotel Appraisals Becoming More Difficult in Face of Demands to Value Intangible Assets / Lawrence E. Henry, MAI / May 2004
2003 U.S. Hotel Profit Loss To Be Reversed in 2004; Expense Creep and Control Influence Profitability / May 2004
PKF Consulting/HRG Survey Forecasts Banner Year for Hotel Transactions; Investors Favoring the Full-service Segment / May 2004
Hotel Utility Costs; Surge Protection Is Needed / PKF Consulting / March 2004
Managing Hotel Labor Costs / PKF Consulting / February 2004
Demand in the Full-service Hotel Sector is Expected to Increase by 6.3% in 2004; Best and Worst Hotel Markets in Terms of RevPAR Growth / PKF Consulting / January 2004
First Uptick for Hotel Industry in Three Years; Full-Service Hotels Lead the Way In U.S. Hotel Profits for 2004 / Hospitality Research Group / March 2004


To search Hotel Online data base of News and Trends Go to Hotel.Online Search


Home | Welcome! | Hospitality News | Classifieds | Catalogs & Pricing | Viewpoint Forum | Ideas/Trends
Please contact Hotel.Online with your comments and suggestions.